Tuesday, 2 June 2015

Exam Question

(a) Outline for your performers two ways that might indicate the relationships between Lysistrata and Calonice at the start of this extract.

The name Lysistrata indicates "releaser of armies", and as the director, I wish to show this by expressing Lysistrata as a strong and independent women, who's loyalty towards women stretches all over the world. Calenice represents "fine victory", and I want to highlight this by expressing her as someone who is forever faithful and loyal to her friends, but also has her fiery temper that allows her opinion to be put across. I will need to the actors playing them to have a natural chemistry both on and off stage, because the characters friendship needs to look natural, and effortless. 

To get the actors completely comfortable, I would give them a small extract from the play (only a page or so long), and get them to reenact this section multiple times in different styles with different objectives. I want the actors to come out of their comfort zones to make each other feel relaxed. Different themes I will get them to interpret would be for Calenice to emphasise her feminism and sexuality, and to highlight Lysistrata's control and dominance. However, I would put a twist on these themes and put them in difficult situations such as a non-vocal performance, a one-tone vocal performance, a futuristic performance based on them waiting for a bus, an animal interpretation and so on. All these experiments will be spontaneous, making the actors think on their toes and outside the box, which will make them work well together.  

I am setting the play during WW2 (1939-1945),  Lysistrata and Calenice are two original women who have grown up in the village that has given out homes to evacuees. To really emphasise their friendship, a rehearsal technique I would get the actors to take part in would be mirroring. Mirroring involves one person taking the lead, and performing actions for one or multiple people to follow, and try their best to stay in time. I would start the two actors off facing each other, then choosing one to take the lead, and one to follow. This is a physical warm up that allows the actors to get an idea of different movements and positions that will allow their characters to flow well together. Because I would have preciously done the spontaneous exercise of them following an extract and doing different interpretations, by now the actors would feel more comfortable around each other. Normal everyday actions and activities are what I will get the actors to start off with, then gradually get them to exaggerate their actions more, becoming more and more abstract. The object is for them to stay in sync, and for the leader to think clearly about the actions they will produce, and to come up with easy ways to make it easy for the other person to follow. The other person will also have to concentrate fully to follow the leader with clear actions that flow together. I will then get them to take turns in being the leader, and ask them to create actions that show them greeting someone for the first time, and greeting someone they have known all their life. I want the actors to distinguish a style for familiarity, and alienation, as this will be important when representing their friendship.

I feel these two exercises will allow the actors to bond well, and become comfortable and relaxed around each other, which will be highlighted towards the audience, and allow their friendship to become clear. 

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

SWED FINAL FINAL


Michaela Spinks-SWED A2 Theatre

Our stimulus was Shakespeare, therefore we were to direct and perform our own interpretation of our chosen Shakespearean play. Shakespeare was known as the world’s dramatist, with his collaborations consisting of 38 plays, 154 sonnets, and two long narrative poems.

Before we decided on our ruling idea, as a group, we each took it upon ourselves to research into Elizabethan times. I volunteered to look into the society of the Elizabethan period, as I thought this would have a big influence on Shakespeare's plays. From looking at the website "Shakespeare in American Communities", I discovered that it was the British Peerage that determined one's position within society. This therefore influenced the ranking of where Shakepseare's characters would be placed on the stature of society. The Duke and Marquess were seen as the highest ranks from being seen as a leader whereas the Viscount and Baron were seen as the lowest rank from holding land directly from the King or Queen. This information wasn't necessarily helpful to my group and our production, however it did emphasise the structure of authority within society, and how some people were not seen as so important. We did try to incorporate this by showing that the witches were not people that you should be proud off to know, or see because they were not popular in the rank of society. People would be accused of being a witch which highlighted paranoia within that period, which links back to the paranoia throughout Macbeth. I also found that the women were very lowly thought of and was allowed no opinion and were to be seen and not heard within society. This specific piece of information was helpful to my group because we knew that Lady Macbeth was not just an ordinary working class lady, she was a part of the royal family and would have been treated with far more respect from outsiders. However we wanted to contradict the expected quietness she would show, and show her as overpowering and demanding. To the further my knowledge on Shakespeare and Macbeth, I went back to basics on the website BBC Bitesize:William Shakespeare to gather more background information. Macbeth is a popular story of Shakespeare's because it covers themes of ambition and the evils we will go to in order to get what we want. This influenced my group to express the strain on Macbeth to live up to his expectations.

We then as a group decided on the ruling idea of “Illusion”. This was bought up in discussion when we each looked into a number of themes that were apparent throughout Shakespeare’s plays. We also felt this is a recurring theme throughout Macbeth that not many people are aware off. As we didn't feel we had enough to go on just by thinking of the theme "Illusion", we looked into a range of theatrical practitioners to see the different ways of representing this theme, we looked in The point behind Epic Theatre was to get the audience to think, and my group and I agreed this was something we wished to use. To gather additional information on whether our ruling idea would work, as a group we watched productions of Macbeth performed in an epic theatre style, which were very abstract and quite haunting which appealed to us. Although we wanted to modernise the play to appeal to a 21st century audience, the style of speech would remain the same, however we discussed changing some of the lines around, swapping characters specific lines to see if they were given a different meaning depending on the character who says it. Crime and punishment was very much a part of life back in the Elizabethan times, and all of Shakespeare's plays involve some form of violence and justice, we had ideas about incorporating these aspects by making them the structure of the play e.g. a courtroom, however we didn’t want this to take away the attention of our ruling idea.

I feel as a group we all embraced a directorial role. When I felt my group were spending too much time talking about our ideas, I encouraged them to get up and physically perform these ideas to see if they were dramatically successful. I feel this allowed enthusiasm to be passed around the group. The initial idea of a court case was first brought up by Shantel, I then contributed the idea that I could be representing whether or not Macbeth is found guilty of the killing of King Duncan. We found this would be difficult to convey this idea to the audience, particularly because we could only use Shakespearean text. As a group, we kept a book full of ideas from each rehearsals session, which helped us with progression. We then took part in exercises involving us either coming up with a noise or movement that we thought would represent Illusion. This wasn’t to necessarily incorporate into our final ideas, it was just to get an idea if we could show this particular idea.

To incorporate the influence from a variety of practitioners, we had a class workshop that allowed our memories to be refreshed, or enlightened with someone new we were unaware of. Throughout rehearsals, we discussed various possible responses we wanted to gain from the audience. Firstly, we wanted to make them feel on edge, as this linked back to our ruling idea. Georgia linked this to the practitioner Artuad. She explained the unnerving nature of his work, would allow the audience to feel uncomfortable, but intrigued. We wanted them to feel like they're involved within in the performance, and to do this we spoke directly to the audience, not only throughout our own individual monologues, but also within all scenes particularly when playing the witches. We also wanted them to feel intimidated and we did this by our choice of a conventional stage layout for the audience, and we incorporated rostra’s to represent different height levels, with us actors being higher up than the audience to influence more intimidation. When we ran on stage as the witches, we ran towards the audience which influenced them to move backwards. By controlling and manipulating the audience’s movements, us actors gained control and authority by taking away their free choice. Stanislavski's system of using emotion memory influenced our performance because it was the method we chose to produce realistic and relatable characters. Allowing ourselves to become emotionally attached to the characters, particularly helped me become more expressive and believable. This style of acting related back to Stanslavski. Imagining ourselves in these real life situations helped our progression of our characters by giving us an objective in each scene which gave them a solid background. We each used one line from the play, spoken by our character, that when we said it out loud, or in our heads, it reminded us of the feelings and emotions we wanted to use to portray our characters. Artuad was also a very big influence towards the techniques side of our production (lighting, costume). He created a form of theatre called the "Theatre of cruelty”. We started off the first scene with screaming and shouting from the witches to allow the audience to think more about what was happening. This highlighted our intention to have a powerful effect on the audience, allowing them to see a piece of work that would stir up an array of emotions and concerns. We wanted the audience to think about the performance, and think about how it’s reflecting to them, and this were influenced by Brecht. His aim was to make the audience to think, and to know they are watching a performance and not real life.

As a group, we worked well together by using our own contributions. Natasha contributed by being very good at note taking, however she tends to struggle when playing a character out of her comfort zone. To help Natasha, we got her to repeat certain lines from the script such as "Double double, toil and trouble, fire burn, and cauldron bubble" with different voices and body movements. Her exaggerations enthused the rest of us to also go out of our comfort zones, which relaxed the atmosphere throughout rehearsals. Georgia was good at her time management of knowing which scene to go into next. This helped the rest of us to follow in her lead. Georgia was also very adamant to learn her lines straight away, this also speeded up the process of us writing our own script, and allowed better teamwork by us all helping each other to learn our lines. Natt seemed to withdraw from expressing all of his ideas at the start, however gradually he become more confident. The only problem with Natt was that he didn't learn his lines till near the day of performance which affected the group by decreasing the amount of real and thorough rehearsal time we had without any stopping, therefore the majority of our rehearsals involved stopping and starting and had no real flow. Shantel completely becomes the character she is playing. She's good with both facial expressions and body movements, however Shantel can get easily distracted which is difficult especially when you have limited rehearsal time. She also sometimes wouldn't turn up to rehearsals, or lessons which affected us massively because all of us 5 actors were on stage for the majority of the play, so having someone missing was difficult because lines would be missing and certain movements and transitions would be messy. As a group, we kept a written document on the process of our rehearsals. This contained notes of what we wanted to achieve within each rehearsal period we had, and if there were any inconveniences, how we would go about them. Some rehearsals, particularly those in the morning, the group as a whole lacked enthusiasm and determination, however once we knew what we wanted to achieve there was a better flow in our rehearsals. As my group and I struggled to decide on where to start, once we did have a first scene to work with, we did spend too much time going over this scene continuously to perfect it straight away, however this decreased our progression towards the initial performance because we spent more time on the first scene (which we ended up changing once we completed more scenes and realised they didn't flow so well together), than we did any of the others. We contributed a lot of transitions from scenes into our rehearsals, as we wanted to be able to achieve full rehearsals without any stopping.

To settle on one particular play, each person in my group went away and brainstormed on the different Shakespearean plays to list our preferences. After much discussion, we finally settled on Macbeth as we thought this play in particular incorporated a range of themes such as power, ambition, relationships, trust and loyalty. It's quite a popular story, a lot of people will know the original and therefore be surprised and intrigued when we show our interpretation. We then went on to create still images of the themes within Macbeth with a time limit of 1 minute. This was to help us express the story, but also highlighting our ruling idea. After choosing our play, we each then said which character we would prefer to play. I chose Lady Macbeth because I think her character has a lot of depth. We decided as a group that we would present our production as a dramaturgy style to really hone in on the dramatic and powerful style of performance. We experimented communicating our characters by trying a range of facial expressions and body movements that would highlight her femininity as a women, but also their power as a male. This was to highlight the gender divide within Elizabethan times. I experimented with the facial expressions by interpreting each of the different themes that I thought Lady Macbeth would represent e.g. showing femininity, I smiled slightly to look accepting and approachable. To experiment with body movements I walked around the room naturally at first, I then stopped and gained a powerful body structure by imagining a piece of string pulling at the top of my head. This pushed my upper body forward which emphasised confidence, but it also helped me keep my overall balance and structure. I wanted Lady Macbeth’s emotions and feelings to come across very clear, therefore I over exaggerated every movement. I also tried subtle expressions as well, which juxtaposed with the abstract and almost fantasy style of the overall play.

Back in the times of Elizabethan England, women were very dependent on men, however one discussion within my group was about whether or not Macbeth killed King Duncan through his own actions or through the manipulation of his wife Lady Macbeth. Natasha gave the idea of switching the typical idea of Macbeth overruling Lady Macbeth, and instead have her showing the dominance. The scene we chose to represent this was after the murder of King Duncan, when Lady Macbeth is scolding Macbeth for not smearing the sleepy grooms with blood. We incorporated Macbeths lines of "Whence is that knocking?" and "I can hear a knocking" to show his vulnerability and Lady Macbeths anger at his cowardice. I communicated the stress at his failure by shaking my head in panic, frantically waving my hands to signify the urgency and importance of his mistakes. I tried to show no remorse with my tone of voice, as I wanted it to sound like she was scolding a child.

We all played a part of the witches. Our first idea was for each of us to have a different personality, or persona for our witch to have e.g. my witch was timid and scared. Nat was the main witch, the leader who was strong and confident. Natasha was the cocky witch, the smug sarcastic one who oozed confidence. Georgia was going to play the smart witch, the closest to the main witch. Finally, Shantel was going to play the crazy witch, loud but scary. To really get into our characters, we would repeat a chant that they say at the beginning of scene 1, "Double double, toil and trouble, fire burn and caldron bubble", which we repeated over again, loud and then quite, high pitched then low pitched, unclear then very clear, and we even tried speaking over one another to express the dominance and fear. Repeating over one another worked for us all because it made us come out of our comfort zones and it also improved our team work in terms of creating a sense of rhythm and co-ordination. We tried movements that looked like puppets, because this fitted in with our ruling idea of illusion, and making them fantasy instead of real. The idea of them being controlled like puppets was to insinuate that they were there in the scene for a reason. We tried mirroring each other to create the same movements at the same time to express unison within the witches, however was a struggle as we couldn't work out the best movements to make the scene flow and look natural. Overall these exercises allowed me to develop my character by really getting a range of ways to express the witch I was playing.

A few people in our group were more familiar with Macbeth than others, however we used this to our advantage because the ones who were more familiar could bring the knowledge, and the ones who were not so familiar, myself included, could bring the new ideas and perceptions of the meaning behind the play. To develop the ruling idea into the play, each of us looked into different themes within the play, which were allocated by myself firstly volunteering to look into loyalty and trust. We then gathered our information, and the next time we met up we compared notes. The theme of trust and loyalty was quite popular. We discussed how this links in with the whole illusion of the witches, and their influence towards King Duncan’s murder by manipulating Macbeth’s mind. One difficulty my group and I had was settling on one idea, which resulted in us losing a lot of practical experiments to see what did and didn’t work. This slowed down our development because we didn't find out if the ideas would work or not as we didn't try them out, we just made our decision through discussion. 

Our stage was set in a site-specific style which was to influence a promenade structure that would allow the audience to walk around or stand on the stage with the actors. This emphasized a more intimate and private atmosphere. However, keeping safety regulations in mind, we mainly kept to a thrust stage as though not to block the fire exists. Not giving the audience chairs resulted in putting the audience in a slightly uncomfortable position. We were told to use 4 rostres at the start, however further down the rehearsal stages we were told the 4th rostre would be for the person recording. We worked with this by deciding to work more with the audience by incorporating a member of the audience within our first scene with the witches, and having the audience standing allowed them to become more accessible. Once we had brought this person into our performance and returned them back, although the audience looked uneasy and backed off slightly in case they were also going to be picked, it highlighted an intense atmosphere that made everyone feel on edge. We kept the staging very simplistic to relate back to Brecht’s bare staging, and any props we used were already on show. The lighting we used was mainly white spotlights on the actors that were on the middle of the floor in front of the audience, however the rostres were always lit as we had actors who were not part of the scene, creating still images on the rostre’s. For the “Crowning scene”, we incorporate a purple wash to highlight royalty. All the scenes involving the audience we used green and blue spotlights to influence mystical and evilness from the witches.

When it came to organising the costumes and props, we knew that we wanted to keep it all very minimalistic, so for costumes we kept all outfits for all characters just black. We thought that costumes would distract the audience’s attention towards our ideas of representing illusion, as if they were too realistic they wouldn't fit in with our theme of an un-natural setting. We added props such as a crown for the scene in which Macbeth was crowned King to emphasize what was happening. We used sticks in the first scene with the witches to exaggerate the sound and create a more intense atmosphere. We also wanted the clothes to be comfortable for us actors, otherwise the actions may not have looked so natural.

 We incorporated thunder and lightning within the first scene to create dramatic tension and add a sense of panic and concern within the audience. We then slowly had this drowning out when the first witch started to speak. For the scene when Macbeth was being crowned, we added the sound of trumpets to influence a sense of royalty and humour that juxtaposed with the circumstances as to how Macbeth became King. We incorporated physical theatre by pulling on Georgia who was playing Macbeth, to emphasize Macbeth’s confusion from his actions. When we were pulling Georgia, we were representing all the influences he had towards his actions e.g. Lady Macbeth, Banquo and King Duncan.

After performing on the night, I had people complimenting my versatility within the characters I played. I felt triumphant about this because I wanted the two characters to be easily distinguished, especially because I had no change in outfit to highlight each character. We planned for the story of Macbeth to be less apparent throughout our performance, and be more about picking out scenes we thought were relevant. There was a technical issue with the lighting and sound during our performance. During one of the monologues within our play, there was a blackout for at least half a minute. Luckily, the actor carried on throughout, however it put all of us on edge because we didn’t know if the lights had blown, or whether the lighting technician had got something wrong. The sound of trumpets in the crowning scene was the cue to our actions, however instead of trumpets the thunder and lightning played instead. The two actors at the front who were to lead the actions that followed, however they waited for the thunder to stop, then went on with the actions and we followed their lead. I would have liked for the audience to have moved around more, and been brave enough to come onto the stage, however a lot of people are not massively educated on this type of performance.

Tuesday, 14 April 2015

SWED Final

Michaela Spinks



After choosing our chosen Play (Macbeth), we each then said which character we would prefer to play, and I chose Lady Macbeth. After our initial exploration as a group we decided on the ruling idea "Illusion", as we feel this is a recurring theme throughout Macbeth that not many people are aware of. We decided as a group that we would present our production as a dramaturgy style, however, I made a point that I would like my style of acting for my character to be more Stanslavaski, as it is how I would be able to represent my character to my full potential.

I experimented communicating my character by trying a range of facial expressions and body movements that would highlight her femininity, but also my power. I experimented with the facial expressions by interpreting each of the different themes that I wanted her to represent e.g. to show power, I kept my head up high, squinted my eyes slightly to make them look more focused, my eyebrows naturally narrowed, however I created a slight smirk with my mouth to emphasise a sense of confidence from Lady Macbeth. To experiment with body movements I walked around the room naturally at first, I then stopped and gained a powerful body structure by imagining a piece of string pulling at the top of my head, my head raised, my arms were crossed across my chest. This pushed my upper body forward which emphasised confidence, but it also helped me keep my overall balance and structure. I wanted Lady Macbeths emotions and feelings to come across very clear, therefore I tried over exaggerating my facial expressions and body movements to the point they were over the top and out of the ordinary, however I also tried the actions and facial expressions in a more subtle way to come across as cunning, but also quite sly, so that it could be obvious to the audience what she was up to, but not so obvious to the rest of the characters. The subtlety of my character juxtaposed with the abstract and almost fantasy style of the overall play, which would highlight Lady Macbeth’s stubbornness and individuality.

My role began to emerge when I was put with the other characters, as I began to think as to how Lady Macbeth would respond to general conversation. Back in the times of Elizabethan England, women were very dependent on men, however one discussion within my group was about whether or not Macbeth killed King Duncan through his own actions or through the manipulation of his wife Lady Macbeth. To express this, we wanted to switch the typical idea of Macbeth overruling Lady Macbeth, and have him running around following her instructions. The scene we chose to represent this was after the murder of King Duncan, when Lady Macbeth is scolding Macbeth for not smearing the sleepy grooms with blood. We incorporated Macbeths lines of "Whence is that knocking?" and "I can hear a knocking" to show his vulnerability and Lady Macbeths anger at his cowardice. I communicated the stress at his failure by shaking my head in panic, frantically waving my hands to signify the urgency and importance of his mistakes. I tried to show no remorse with my tone of voice, as I wanted it to sound like she was scolding a child.


We all played a part of the witches, and we had many different ideas as to how we wished to portray them. Our first idea was for each of us to have a different personality, or persona for our witch to have e.g. my witch was the newcomer, timid and scared and very nervous. Nat’s witch was the main witch, the leader who was strong and confident. Natasha was the cocky witch, the smug sarcastic one who oozed confidence. Georgia was going to play the smart witch, the closest to the main witch, the intelligent one. Finally, Shantel was going to play the crazy witch, loud but scary. To really get into our characters, we would repeat a chant that they say at the beginning of scene 1, "Double double, toil and trouble, fire burn and caldron bubble", which we repeated over again, loud and then quite, high pitched then low pitched, unclear then very clear, and we even tried speaking over one another to express the dominance and fear. Repeating over one another worked for us all because it made us come out of our comfort zones and it also improved our team work in terms of creating a sense of rhythm and co-ordination. We incorporated shouting within the first scene to introduce them, because we wanted them to be feared and come across as haunting and possessed. We then tried movements that looked like puppets, because this fitted in with our ruling idea of illusion, and making them fantasy instead of real. The idea of them being controlled like puppets was to insinuate that they were there in the scene for a reason. We tried robotic movements to again make them look controlled, however this was more of a modernised and abstract interpretation as opposed to the puppets. We tried mirroring each other to create the same movements at the same time to express unison within the witches, however this proved a slight struggle as we couldn't quite work out the best movements to make the scene flow well and look natural. Overall these exercises allowed me to develop my character by really getting a range of ways to express the certain witch I was playing, and allowed me to see what worked best and what didn't. 




Our stimulus for the devising process was Shakespeare, therefore we were to direct and perform our own interpretation of our chosen Shakespearean play. Shakespeare was known as the world’s dramatist, with his collaborations consisting of 38 plays, 154 sonnets, and two long narrative poems. To choose a play to produce a production on, together my group and I researched various Shakespearean plays such as Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummers Night’s Dream, Othello, and also looked into combining them all together (we thought this would be a natural way of incorporating humour into the piece). Each person in my group went away and brainstormed on the different plays to see which ones we each preferred, and which we thought we could easily adapt into our own version. After much discussion when we got back together, we finally settled on Macbeth as we thought this play in particular incorporated a range of themes such as power, ambition, relationships, trust and loyalty, which would give us a broad range to experiment with, and because it's quite a popular story, a lot of people will know the original and therefore be surprised and intrigued when we show our interpretation.


A few people in our group were more familiar with Macbeth than others, however we used this to our advantage because the ones who were more familiar could bring the knowledge, and the ones who were not so familiar, myself included, could bring the fresh new ideas and perceptions of the meaning behind the play. To come up with the overall ruling idea of the play, we each looked into different themes within the play, which were allocated by myself firstly volunteering to look into loyalty and trust, and then the others following and choosing their own theme. We then gathered our information, and the next time we met up we compared notes. Unexpectedly, we all had a few of the same ideas and notes on inequality throughout the play and the pressure and expectations on Macbeth, and also discovered that one way or another all the themes linked in with each other. The theme of trust and loyalty was quite popular, however someone else in the group had looked into illusion. We discussed how this links in with the whole illusion of the witches, and their influence towards King Duncan’s murder, and also the illusion of Lady Macbeth being this loving wife with only the best intentions of her husband, however really being the opposite in some people’s opinions. As we didn't feel we had enough to go on just by thinking of the theme "Illusion", we looked into a range of theatrical practitioners to see the different ways of representing this theme, we looked into Artuad’s idea of epic theatre which was a theatrical movement arising in the 20th century. The point behind Epic Theatre was to get the audience to think, and my group and I agreed this was something we wished to use, particularly if using the theme "Illusion" because it isn't the most obvious theme to express. One difficulty my group and I had was settling on one idea, which resulted in us losing a lot of practical experiments to see what did and didn’t work. This slowed down our development because we didn't actually find out if the ideas would work or not as we didn't try them out, we just made our decision through discussion. 



To gather additional information on whether our rulling idea of "Illusion" would work, as a group we watched productions of Macbeth performed in an epic theatre style, which were very abstract and quite haunting which is a style we would like to go for. To keep a sense of Shakespeare within our play, we did want it to be quite comical, but this was just to help express the deeper meanings within the play that the viewers may not have seen or thought about before. Although we wanted to modernise the play in terms of the acting and set design, the speech would be kept the same, however we discussed changing some of the lines around, maybe swapping characters specific lines to see if they were given a different meaning depending on the character who says it. Crime and punishment was very much a part of life back in the Elizabethan times, and all of Shakespeare's plays involve some form of violence and justice, we had ideas about incorporating these aspects by making them the structure of the play e.g. a courtroom, however we didn’t want this to take away the attention of our ruling idea.



There were 5 of us in the group, and each had their own strengths and weaknesses that we used to our advantage. For example, Natasha contributed by being very good at note taking, however she tends to struggle when playing a character out of her comfort zone. To help Natasha come out of her comfort zone and experiment with different voices and movements, we got her to repeat certain lines from the script such as "Double double, toil and trouble, fire burn, and cauldron bubble". Even though she found it challenging to slow her speech down and to put some facial expressions and body movements along with it, we managed to get her to practise it in a more natural way then becoming more abstract for her to familiarise herself with her movements.



Georgia contributed by trying anything in terms of different styles of acting, whether it's in her comfort zone or not. She was also good at her time management in terms of knowing which scene to go into next, and where and when she needed to be ready. This helped the rest of us to follow in her lead. Georgia was also very adamant to learn her lines straight away as she said she has difficulty to learn them quickly, this also speeded up the process of us writing our own script, and allowed better teamwork by us all helping each other to learn our lines.


At the start of the exploration, Natt seemed to withdraw from expressing all of his ideas, however gradually he become more confident. The only problem with Natt was that he didn't learn his lines till near the day of performance which affected the group by decreasing the amount of real and thorough rehearsal time we had without any stopping, therefore the majority of our rehearsals involved stopping and starting and had no real flow.

Shantel is a very talented actress, because she completely becomes the character she is playing. She's good with both facial expressions and body movements, however Shantel can get easily distracted which is difficult especially when you have limited rehearsal time. She also sometimes wouldn't turn up to rehearsals, or lessons which affected us massively because all of us 5 actors were on stage for the majority of the play, so having someone missing was difficult because lines would be missing and certain movements and transitions would be messy.

I feel I contributed to the group by bringing the enthusiasm in rehearsals, and by getting all the last minute aspects such as the lighting and props together in the last few stages of rehearsal. When I felt my group were spending too much time talking about our ideas, I encouraged them to get up and physically perform these ideas to see if they were dramatically successful. I feel this allowed enthusiasm to be passed around the group, and when we had a bad rehearsal, or something didn't necessarily go to plan, I managed to find a positive and a goal to work towards.

Our stage was set in a site-specific style which was to influence a promenade structure that would allow the audience to walk around or stand on the stage with the actors. This emphasized a more intimate and private atmosphere. We chose our piece to be conventional and chose not give the audience chairs which resulted in putting the audience in a slightly uncomfortable position. We wanted to incorporate a member of the audience within our first scene with the witches, and having the audience standing allowed them to become more accessible. Once we had brought this person into our performance and returned them back, although the audience looked uneasy and backed off slightly in case they were also going to be picked, it highlighted an intense atmosphere that made everyone feel on edge.

As a group, we planned for various possible responses from the audience. Firstly, we wanted to make them feel on edge by starting off with loud banging and screaming. We wanted them to be intrigued and feel like they're involved within in the performance, and to do this we spoke directly to them not only throughout our own individual monologues, but also within all scenes particularly when playing the witches. We also wanted them to feel intimidated and we did this by our choice of a conventional stage layout for the audience, and we incorporated rostra’s to represent different height levels, with us actors being higher up than the audience to influence more intimidation. When we ran on stage as the witches, we ran towards the audience which influenced them to move backwards. By controlling and manipulating the audience’s movements, us actors gained control and authority by taking away their free choice.

As a group, we kept a written document on the process of our rehearsals. This contained notes of what we wanted to achieve within each rehearsal period we had, and if there were any inconveniences, how we would go about them. Some rehearsals, particularly those in the morning, the group as a whole lacked enthusiasm and determination, however once we knew what we wanted to achieve there was a better flow in our rehearsals. As my group and I struggled to decide on where to start, once we did have a first scene to work with, we did spend too much time going over this scene continuously to perfect it straight away, however this decreased our progression towards the initial performance because we spent more time on the first scene (which we ended up changing once we completed more scenes and realised they didn't flow so well together), than we did any of the others. We contributed a lot of transitions from scenes into our rehearsals, as we wanted to be able to achieve full rehearsals without any stopping.


Initially we were not 100% certain on what our ruling idea was going to be, however we each took it upon ourselves to research into Elizabethan times. I volunteered to look into the society of the Elizabethan period, as I thought this would have big influence on Shakespeare's plays. From looking at the website "Shakespeare in American Communities", I discovered that it was the British Peerage that determined one's position within society. This therefore influenced the ranking of where Shakepseare's characters would be placed on the stature of society. The Duke and Marquess were seen as the highest ranks from being seen as a leader whereas the Viscount and Baron were seen as the lowest rank from holding land directly from the King or Queen. This information wasn't necessarily helpful to my group and our production, however it did emphasise the structure within society, and how people were not seen as so important. We did try to incorporate this by showing that the witches were not people that you should be proud of know, or see because they were not popular in the rank of society. People would be accused of being a witch which highlighted paranoia within that period, which links back to the paranoia throughout Macbeth. I also found that the women were very lowly thought of and was allowed no opinion and were to be seen and not heard within society. This specific piece of information was helpful to my group because we knew that Lady Macbeth was not just an ordinary working class lady, she was a part of the royal family and would have been treated with far more respect from outsiders. However we wanted to contradict the expected quietness she would show, and show her as overpowering and demanding. To the further my knowledge on Shakespeare and Macbeth, I went back to basics on the website BBC Bitesize:William Shakespeare to gather more background information. Macbeth is a popular story of Shakespeare's because it covers themes of ambition and the evils we will go to in order to get what we want. This influenced my group to express the strain on Macbeth to live up to his expectations.



Stanislavski's system of using emotion memory influenced our performance because it was the method we chose to produce realistic and relatable characters. Allowing ourselves to become emotionally attached to the characters, particularly helped me become more expressive and believable. As none of us in the group had experienced real life versions of the events in Macbeth, it was difficult for any of us to have anything to relate to, however we asked ourselves "How would we feel if we were in this situation?” This helped our progression of our characters by giving us an objective in each scene which created them a solid background. We each used one line from the play, spoken by our character, that when we said it out loud, or in our heads, it reminded us of the feelings and emotions we wanted to use to portray our characters.

 Artuad was also a very big influence towards the techniques side of our production. He created a form of theatre called the "Theatre of cruelty", which he thought would help bring out thoughts within the audience that they may have not been aware of before. He believed in the actors not having an emotional connection with the characters they were playing, he was more into informing the audience about whichever aspect the play was covering. We started off the first scene with screaming and shouting from the witches to allow the audience to think more about what was happening. This highlighted our intention to have a powerful effect on the audience, allowing them to see a piece of work that would stir up an array of emotions and concerns.


When it came to organising the costumes and props, we knew that we wanted to keep it all very minimalistic, so for costumes we kept all outfits for all characters just black. We thought that costumes would distract the audience’s attention towards our ideas of representing illusion, as if they were too realistic they wouldn't fit in with our theme of an un-natural setting. We added props such as a crown for the scene in which Macbeth was crowned King to emphasize what was happening. We used sticks in the first scene with the witches to exaggerate the sound and create a more intense atmosphere.

 We incorporated thunder and lightning within the first scene to create dramatic tension and add a sense of panic and concern within the audience. We then slowly had this drowning out when the first witch started to speak. For the scene when Macbeth was being crowned, we added the sound of trumpets to influence a sense of royalty and humour that juxtaposed with the circumstances as to how Macbeth became King. We incorporated physical theatre by pulling on Georgia who was playing Macbeth, to emphasize Macbeth’s confusion from his actions. When we were pulling Georgia, we were representing all the influences he had towards his actions e.g. Lady Macbeth, Banquo and King Duncan.






Monday, 13 April 2015

Research

Research 
-Looked Shakespearean plays 
-Group discussion on which plays we would want to do(Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, combined) 
-Researched the society within Elizabethan times 
-

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

CV

Michaela Spinks
253 Homestead Way, New Addington
Mobile Number: 07947956137

Personal Statement

Currently a student at Coulsdon Sixth Form College working towards getting the best grades I can with my A level courses which are; Graphics, Photography and Theatre. I also took Geography at AS level. Looking to go to Canterbury Christchurch University in September 2015.

Skills and Qualities

·      Helping people
·      Preparing for meetings
·      Punctual
·      Good telephone manner
·      Caring and considerate
·      Willingness to learn
·      Very creative
·      Well organised
·      Attentive to detail

Education

Coulsdon Sixth Form College
Date: September 2013-Present
Studying: A levels
Addington High School
September 2008-June 2013
10 GCSE’S including English A, Maths C and Science C, Graphic Design B, Drama B.

Work Experience

Name: Playday’s Nursery
Location: Croydon.
June 2012 for 2 weeks
Tasks:
·      Creating educational and fun activities
·      Prepared lunch tables and cleaned up after use
·      Tidied up play areas

Interests

Enjoy reading, have a broad range of books I like to read, it has allowed my vocabulary and imagination to expand. I enjoy art and design, which was my influence to taking Graphics at college.

References

Coulsdon Sixth Form College
Place House Lane
Coulsdon
Surrey
CR5 1YA

Tutor Name: Steve Denton
Phone number: 01737 551 176
Email:steve.denton@coulsdon.ac.uk

Monday, 23 March 2015

Lysistrata Exam Question

Michaela Spinks-Theatre Exam Question

Q) Lysistrata uses humour to tackle serious issues for a 21st century audience. Justify a production of the play in the light of this statement.

As a director, my production for Lysistrata focuses on The Womens Land Army during WW2, which involved the women taking over the agricultural work around rural areas, whilst the men were off fighting in the war. I wish to involve humour within my play through the use of exaggerating the characters personalities, incorporating fluid exaggerated movements, and through the use of experimenting with voice and facial expressions.

To start with, my rehearsals will involve activities such as the actors telling each other silly jokes, or creating abstract still images of certain themes that can allow each actor to come out of their comfort zone. To highlight a sense of humour that some of the characters in the play aren’t apparent off, I would get my actors in rehearsals to produce a movement piece, or still image that is funny, however they are not allowed to laugh, smile or show any form of fun.

When it comes to performing actual scenes in the play, scene 1 for example, I would set the stage outside in a park, or in a field to make the atmosphere calm and tranquil. For vocal comedy, when Calenice appears, I would want her to come across as play full and fun, however sensual and flirty. With lines such as “Big and meaty you mean?” and “Something pretty flimsy, then, surely, if it’s so easy to toss about?” I would want Calenice to talk very slow and in an obvious way, address the audience when she makes these sensual remarks. I get the impression she is purposefully tantalising and winding Lysistrata up with these remarks, therefore actions such as winks towards the audience, or caressing something in her hand are the sort of actions that would express the joke she is playing towards her friend.


For physical comedy, take scene 1 again however further on down the scene when Myrrhine arrives, this is where I would like it to get more physical in terms of using more space. After Lysistrata has told them her idea of renouncing sex, both Calenice and Myrrhine seemed startled and taken aback, and to really express this shock, but also highlight the humour, I would want Calenice to fall on her knees and act as though the worst thing that could possibly happen has happened. I would like Myrrhine to be so taken aback at first that her body is frozen, but then suddenly she starts breathing heavy and quick, and over dramatic as though she has minutes left to live. When Myrrhine says “But look, suppose we did renounce-what you said-which may heaven forbid-“ at this point I would like her to turn to the audience on the line of “heaven forbid” I would like her to turn to the audience and say this with a stern but insecure voice which will highlight her serious humour.

Wednesday, 4 March 2015

Task 1

Text Box: Today’s societyText Box: Ancient Greece

The place of theatre in the society of the time.

There was a theatre in most Greek cities, whether it is in the open air or usually in a bowl-shaped arena on a hillside. Some were very big, allowing room for more than 15,000 people in the audience.
The place of theatre in the society of the time.

The places of theatre today are very diverse, expanding across the whole of England. There is a wide range of plays available to watch due to the increase of play writers, availability to better equipment and facilities.
It’s impact on each section of society

Within the ancient Greek world, religion was personal and present in all areas of life. Greek plays (Lysistrata in particular), involve the character swearing to the God of Athena or Zeus, which is when the characters appeared passionate or desperate.
There was a sense of community when these plays were performed, as they were held during festivals such as the City Dionysian of Athens, which involved athletic games and competitions.
It’s impact on each section of society

Theatre is used today, not only for those who enjoy dramatic performance, but to educate those of both younger and older years about lifestyles that may not appeal to them. To educate younger children, serious situations such as death, war and illness could be made more humorous and light hearted to allow them to understand. Those of an older age, who may understand the full lengths on today’s society, a more sophisticated and backdated way of teaching them.
The conventions of the theatre

Plays were performed only during the daytime. Props and verbal references became a very large part of “setting the scene” for performances. The large outdoor theatres could seat 14,000 to 15000 spectators.
The conventions of the theatre

Theatrical performance involves freeze frames, caricature, pathos, satire, and heightened use of language.
The intended impact on the audience

The theatrical costumes were intended to convey an idea of the dresses actually worn by the persons represented, while those of the Greeks were nothing but modifications of the festal robes worn in Dionysian processions.
The intended impact on the audience

The impact on the audience depends on the playwright’s ruiling idea throughout the play, which will leave the audience enlightened or confused, depending on the mood the play is set. The mood of the play may allow members of the audience to experience new emotions they may not have come across before.
The specific’s of the work of Aristophanes

Aristophanes is a Greek playwright and poet, whose surviving plays are the only extant examples of Greek Old Comedy. Exact details of his birthplace and life are not known, but most likely he was educated in and lived in Athens. Besides his many dramatic works, much poetry is attributed to him.  Many of Aristophanes rollicking comedies were written for and performed during the religious festivals Dionysia and Lenea.